#LEICA 50MM SUMMICRON VS ZEISS 50MM ISO#
#LEICA 50MM SUMMICRON VS ZEISS 50MM SERIES#

#LEICA 50MM SUMMICRON VS ZEISS 50MM ISO#

In 2018, even the most basic mirror-less cameras have truly mind-blowing high ISO performance. If youРІР‚в„ўre shooting on a digital camera then youРІР‚в„ўve likely outgrown your fear of the dark long ago. Modern filmРІР‚в„ўs impressive exposure latitude will help nudge you to where you need to be. If youРІР‚в„ўre shooting film in the dark, get some high sensitivity stuff and go to work. The Summicron, though only sporting a maximum aperture of f/2, will work perfectly in any light conditions. Low light performance is excellent, contrary to what some fans of the Summilux have to say. If you canРІР‚в„ўt make a great photo with this lens itРІР‚в„ўs certainly not because the lens isnРІР‚в„ўt sharp enough. The Summicron R 50mm has a personality that eschews quantifiable metrics. Nail your focus at any aperture setting and unless youРІР‚в„ўre a serious pixel-peeper, youРІР‚в„ўll be pleased.Р”В«ut this whole sharpness paragraph doesnРІР‚в„ўt really matter much. By f/4 weРІР‚в„ўre seeing acceptably sharp rendition from corner to corner, and at f/8 itРІР‚в„ўs a world-class lens. Close the aperture down and (predictably) things tighten up. Shots made with the Summicron R 50mm are sharp in the center at all apertures, a bit spongy in the corners wide open. The barrels are made entirely of metal, as are the filter retaining rings and lens hoods (whether detachable or built-in). Aperture rings click with mechanical precision, focus throw is smooth and perfectly weighted. Fit and finish is what weРІР‚в„ўd expect from a lens bearing the Leitz name. This lens performs better than the earlier single cam version due to improved optical coatings, but lacks the increased contrast and flatness found in the later Leitz Canada version.Р”Р„ny and all versions of the Summicron R 50mm feel utterly fantastic in practical use. The version that I shoot is the earlier optical formula sporting the two cam mount, made contemporaneously with the Leicaflex SL2. It should be noted that none of this matters if youРІР‚в„ўre shooting with an adapter fitted to a mirror-less camera. ThereРІР‚в„ўs also a Safari version (painted green) to match the Safari R3. This later lens was produced in various configurations to fit earlier Leicaflex and later SL and SL2 cameras, as well as the more modern R cam cameras. It also provided a built-in collapsible lens hood. The six elements in four groups construction provided higher contrast and improved flatness of field compared with the earlier lenses. At this time, the optical formula was updated and improved. In 1977, production of the Summicron R was shifted to Leitz Canada. Close focus distance is just twenty inches. Aperture increments actuate in single stops from f/2 to f/16.

#LEICA 50MM SUMMICRON VS ZEISS 50MM SERIES#

For later R series cameras, these lenses could also be supplied with the required three cam mounts.Р”Р„ll three of these Summicron models were made in Wetzlar, with optical construction consisting of six elements in five groups. It remained in production until 1968, at which time a version with two metering cams was made to fit the new Leicaflex SL (and the subsequent SL2). This lens is differentiated by later lenses by its single cam mount. The original Leicaflex saw the first release of a Summicron 50mm in R mount. Which is a shame, because IРІР‚в„ўve been shooting the 50mm Summicron R for the past year and itРІР‚в„ўs a stunning performer in nearly every way. No surprise Leica shooters skew toward rangefinders, and sticker shock keeps kids looking for cheap legacy lenses from buying an R. Made to fit LeicaРІР‚в„ўs R mount SLR cameras, Leitz R series lenses donРІР‚в„ўt enjoy the fanfare heaped on their M mount brethren.

Leica 50mm summicron vs zeiss 50mm